Superman Film Watchdogs
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Jim Shooter's blog

3 posters

Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Jim Shooter's blog

Post  thecolorsblend Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:35 pm

http://www.jimshooter.com/

In this day and age, at least 9 out of 10 blogs are a complete waste of time for all parties concerned. But Jim Shooter's blog? MUCH different story. His reputation has largely been determined by his enemies (a list that's long but distinguished) so it's refreshing to hear him give his part of the story.

It's another reminder to us that there are at least two sides to every story. Some of Shooter's stories overlap with stories from other creators (Chris Claremont and John Byrne, for example) but it's hard not to see his point of view in a good many of cases.

Overall, I encourage all of you to swing by his page and check it out. It's definitely worth your time.
thecolorsblend
thecolorsblend
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 4257
Points : 5802
User Reputation : 287
Join date : 2010-12-02

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  webhead2006 Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:35 pm

Did any one see this story:
http://www.jimshooter.com/2011/08/superman-first-marvel-issue.html?m=1

Friday, August 26, 2011SUPERMAN – First Marvel Issue!
Sometime in February, 1984, my secretary (it was okay to say “secretary” in those days) the wonderful Lynn Cohen told me that Bill Sarnoff was on the phone. Not his secretary, Bill Sarnoff himself, holding for me.

Great Scott!

Bill Sarnoff was the Big Cheese, I forget his exact title, of the publishing arm of Warner Communications. Among the operations under his purview was DC Comics.

Bill introduced himself, as if that was necessary. What he wanted to talk about was licensing the publishing rights for all DC characters to Marvel Comics.

Holy hegemony, Billman!

Bill said, more or less, that Marvel seemed to be able to turn a substantial profit on publishing comics, as opposed to DC, which consistently lost money, a lot of money, and had for a long time. On the other hand, LCA (Licensing Corporation of America), Warner’s licensing arm did very well with the DC properties, while Marvel “didn’t seem to do much licensing.”

I guess the few million a year we made from licensing, mostly from Spider-Man, seemed paltry to him, what with the fortune that just their big four, Superman, Batman, Robin and Wonder Woman brought in.

I told him I thought Marvel would be very interested, and that I would discuss it with Marvel’s President, Jim Galton.

So, I did. I told Galton about my conversation with Sarnoff. Galton said he’d give Sarnoff a call.

The next day, I went upstairs, poked my head into Galton’s office and asked whether he’d called Sarnoff and, if so, how that went?

Galton said he told Sarnoff we weren’t interested.

I was stunned. Why not?!

Galton said—and this is prima facie evidence of the fact that he missed Comic Books 101 in publishing school—since DC books weren’t selling, “those characters must not be any good.”

Great Krypton!

Trying not to sound too crazed, I explained that they were great characters and that the DC editorial people were, frankly, doing a pretty poor job with them. And that we could do better. A lot better.

I talked him into calling Sarnoff back and telling him we’d give it some thought.

I left his office with instructions to put together a business plan and present it to Joe Calamari, Executive V.P. of Business Affairs.

It took me about three days to put together a presentable plan.

The first part of the business plan was the publishing plan. I decided that we should launch with seven titles and build from there, if all went well. The titles were:

SUPERMAN
BATMAN
WONDER WOMAN
GREEN LANTERN
TEEN TITANS
JUSTICE LEAGUE
LEGION OF SUPER HEROES

I projected that we would sell 39 million copies the first two years generating a pre-tax profit (gross revenues less cost of goods sold, royalties, staff, SG&A, etc.) of roughly $3,500,000.

That was huge money for a comic book publisher in 1984.

That was with just the original seven titles—no expansion of the line—though if we were doing that well, obviously, we’d add titles. Slowly and carefully, if I had anything to say about it.

I anticipated adding one editor, two assistants and one production person to start.

I presented the plan to Joe Calamari, as ordered. Here’s my cover memo:
Jim Shooter's blog Wccoba



Calamari enthusiastically endorsed my plan.

Galton was still skeptical. He thought my projections were crazy high. He sent the plan to the circulation department to review.

Somebody leaked. Rumors spread.

My first clue was when John Byrne showed up in my office one day with his cover for…

Jim Shooter's blog 10yjnlk


It wasn’t a sketch. It was a cover. Might even have been inked, I forget. I don’t have a copy of the thing, but I’ll bet Byrne still has the original. Somebody should ask him to display it on his site if he hasn’t already.

He had a story worked out, too, as I recall. He reallyreallyreally wanted to do Superman.

I think I remember Byrne telling me once that he had watched the first Superman movie over 1,100 times.

Anyway….

When the circulation department said they had completed their analysis of my plan, Galton called a meeting to discuss it. Besides Galton and me, Ed Shukin, V.P. of Circulation and Direct Sales Manager Carol Kalish were present. I don’t think Calamari was there. V.P. of Finance Barry Kaplan might have been.

Galton asked what Shukin’s take on my numbers was. Shukin said the numbers were “ridiculous.” Galton sort of smirked at me.

“We’ll do more than DOUBLE these numbers,” Shukin said.

Oh, my stars and garters!

And so, negotiations with Sarnoff began in earnest. I was a spectator at that point. The suits took over.

However….

Very soon thereafter, First Comics launched a lawsuit against Marvel Comics and others, alleging anti-trust violations, among other things.

One test of anti-competitive market dominance is market share of 70% or more. At that time Marvel held a nearly 70% share, 69-point-something. DC was around 18%.

I think it’s safe to say that when you’re being sued under anti-trust laws, it’s a bad time to devour your largest competitor.

On the other hand, there is the “we-have-a-clue-and-they-don’t” or “superior acumen” defense. We considered arguing that defense and pressing on with the deal.

But, no. Ultimately, the suits and lawyers decided to play it safe and backed away from the DC deal.

Jeepers!

P.S. First’s suit was nonsense. They alleged that we had flooded the market. Our actual increase in releases published during the “flood” year from the year before? Six. Six issues, not series. They alleged that we had used our dominance to fix prices with World Color Press to inflate their costs. In discovery, it came out that we were paying more than they were! (And that news made Galton and the print production people very peeved!) Etc.

Anyway….

I’ll write more about the First suit someday. Enough about that for now.

Net result, no SUPERMAN –First Marvel Issue! Too bad. It would have been fun.


MONDAY: The Famous ROM #1 Cover That Wasn’t, Jim Owsley’s Alleged Humor and the Devil’s Due
Posted by jimshooter at 6:43 PM
man wonder what would have happened if this all went through???


Last edited by webhead2006 on Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:17 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : edited to add full story to read here)
webhead2006
webhead2006
Missing In Action

Posts : 4344
Points : 4854
User Reputation : 2
Join date : 2010-10-16
Age : 39

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  Apologist Puncher Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:10 pm

webhead2006 wrote:Did any one see this story:
http://www.jimshooter.com/2011/08/superman-first-marvel-issue.html?m=1
man wonder what would have happened if this all went through???

Jim Shooter's blog Superman-Marvel

Imagine how different things would be TODAY, if this had come to pass? I mean, in a way it did for Superman, but not for the DC characters and not in a way that would have prevented the bastardized "Superman" you'll be getting next month.
Apologist Puncher
Apologist Puncher
Admin

Posts : 4864
Points : 7476
User Reputation : 548
Join date : 2010-10-11
Age : 48
Location : West Coast, USA

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  webhead2006 Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:26 pm

I Know ap man how things could have been. Really makes you think. What would the state of both marvel/dc be today.
webhead2006
webhead2006
Missing In Action

Posts : 4344
Points : 4854
User Reputation : 2
Join date : 2010-10-16
Age : 39

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  thecolorsblend Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:56 am

Apologist Puncher wrote:
webhead2006 wrote:Did any one see this story:
http://www.jimshooter.com/2011/08/superman-first-marvel-issue.html?m=1
man wonder what would have happened if this all went through???

Jim Shooter's blog Superman-Marvel

Imagine how different things would be TODAY, if this had come to pass? I mean, in a way it did for Superman, but not for the DC characters and not in a way that would have prevented the bastardized "Superman" you'll be getting next month.
True... but at the same time, I'm not sure I trust Marvel with DC character. The thing that underpin the DC universe and make it tick are different from what makes Marvel work. That isn't saying you couldn't wring some badass stories out of it. I think if the characters knew and remembered the pre-merger histories of each universe, you'd have room for conflict from here to Christmas. The Avengers bristling that Superman's running around acting like he's the cure for cancer, Spider-Man (and this was an original idea once upon a time) finding real acceptance and enfranchisement in the JLA or Titans or something, so on and so forth.

Even so, I don't think the good would've outweighed the bad.

Just my opinion.
thecolorsblend
thecolorsblend
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 4257
Points : 5802
User Reputation : 287
Join date : 2010-12-02

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  Apologist Puncher Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:39 am

thecolorsblend wrote:True... but at the same time, I'm not sure I trust Marvel with DC character. The thing that underpin the DC universe and make it tick are different from what makes Marvel work. That isn't saying you couldn't wring some badass stories out of it. I think if the characters knew and remembered the pre-merger histories of each universe, you'd have room for conflict from here to Christmas. The Avengers bristling that Superman's running around acting like he's the cure for cancer, Spider-Man (and this was an original idea once upon a time) finding real acceptance and enfranchisement in the JLA or Titans or something, so on and so forth.

Even so, I don't think the good would've outweighed the bad.

Just my opinion.

What could Marvel POSSIBLY do that is worse than "Craptonian Armor Superman"? Because from where I, and plenty of others apparently, DC is doing the absolute WORST thing they could do with their characters.

Ruining them.
Apologist Puncher
Apologist Puncher
Admin

Posts : 4864
Points : 7476
User Reputation : 548
Join date : 2010-10-11
Age : 48
Location : West Coast, USA

Back to top Go down

Jim Shooter's blog Empty Re: Jim Shooter's blog

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum